Thursday, December 15, 2011

What's Wrong with the Case AGAINST Shorter Work? VI

References

Davenant, Charles, (1699) "An essay upon the probable methods of making people gainers in the balance of trade." In The political and commercial works of that celebrated writer Charles D'Avenant, Volume 2. London, 1771. The Making of the Modern World. Web.

Fisher, George. (1995) "The Birth of the Prison Retold." The Yale Law Journal 104, 6. 1235-1324.

Hicks, J.R. (1932/1963) The Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan.

Jevons, William Stanley. (1866) The Coal Question. 2nd Ed. London: MacMillan & Co.
Kay-Shuttleworth, James Phillips. (1832) The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester.

Keynes, John Maynard, (1934) "Is the Economic System Self-Adjusting." BBC radio address. Reprinted in The Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business. 2, 2, 11-15.

Kinderman, Daniel (2001) The Janus Faced Nature of Working Time Reduction: Between Rationalization Whip and Instrument for Social Justice, Progressive Economics Forum student essay contest winner.

Martin, Henri. (1701) Considerations upon the East-India Trade. London: The Making of the Modern World. Web.

Meiklejohn A. (1959) "Outbreak of Fever in Cotton Mills at Radcliffe, 1784" British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 16, 1, 68-69.

New Economics Foundation. (2010) 21 hours: Why a shorter working week can help us all to flourish in the 21st century. London: New Economics Foundation.

Niemietz, Kristian. (2011) "When Paternalism Meets Bogus Economics: The New Economics Foundation's 21 Hours Report," Institute of Economic Affairs.

Pencavel, J. (1986) ‘Labor Supply of Men: A Survey’, in (O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard,eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam: North Holland. 3-102.

Pigou, Arthur Cecil. (1913) Unemployment. London: Williams and Norgate.

Rasbotham, Dorning. (1780) Thoughts on the Use of Machines in the Cotton Manufacture. Manchester: Making of the Modern World, Web.

Robbins, L. (1929) ‘The economic effects of variations of hours of labour’, Economic Journal, vol. 39, 25-40.

Tufnell, Edward Carleton. (1834) Character, Object and Effects of Trades Unions. London: James Ridgway and Sons.

Walker, Tom. (2000). "The 'Lump-of-Labor' Case Against Work-Sharing: Populist Fallacy or Marginalist Throwback?" in L. Golden and D. M. Figart (eds) Working Time: International Trends, Theory and Policy Perspectives, New York and London: Routledge.

__________. (2007) "Why Economists Dislike a Lump of Labor." Review of Social Economy. 65, 3, 279-291.
Abstract of "Why Economists Dislike a Lump of Labor: The lump-of-labor fallacy has been called one of the “best known fallacies in economics.” It is widely cited in disparagement of policies for reducing the standard hours of work, yet the authenticity of the fallacy claim is questionable, and explanations of it are inconsistent and contradictory. This article discusses recent occurrences of the fallacy claim and investigates anomalies in the claim and its history. S.J. Chapman's coherent and formerly highly regarded theory of the hours of labor is reviewed, and it is shown how that theory could lend credence to the job-creating potentiality of shorter working time policies. It concludes that substituting a dubious fallacy claim for an authentic economic theory may have obstructed fruitful dialogue about working time and the appropriate policies for regulating it.

No comments:

Post a Comment